<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results by user ID 2111</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;u=2111</link><description>Search results by user ID 2111</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Restoring NTBackups created in XP to Vista</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/732/2740.aspx#2740</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:39:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:2740</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;This looks like it will do what you need without the hassle.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=7DA725E2-8B69-4C65-AFA3-2A53107D54A7&amp;amp;mg_id=10105&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=7DA725E2-8B69-4C65-AFA3-2A53107D54A7&amp;amp;mg_id=10105&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Restoring NTBackups created in XP to Vista</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/732/2517.aspx#2517</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:53:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:2517</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;I have just run into the same issue.&amp;nbsp; You can workaround it though.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you copy...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ntbackup.exe&lt;BR&gt;ntmsapi.dll&lt;BR&gt;vsapi.dll&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;From a Windows XP or 2003 system32 directory to a new folder on your Vista install (I put it in c:\program files\ntbackup) it works just fine after ignoring the initial error message.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft OEM Products</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/404/768.aspx#768</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:35:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:768</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Perhaps I did not explain myself clearly enough :)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;This is a new customer to me and they have recently purchased a number of Office 2003 professional&amp;nbsp;and Windows XP&amp;nbsp;OEM from a trusted online store, before they engaged with me.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Now, they did not buy PCs or any hardware in most cases so the licenses are not valid as far as I understand it.&amp;nbsp; This generally is not made 100% clear to the end user at the time of purchase.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Even dabs.com lists the old agreement:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dabs.com/ContentTopic.aspx?ContentType=learnmore&amp;amp;ArticleID=486"&gt;http://www.dabs.com/ContentTopic.aspx?ContentType=learnmore&amp;amp;ArticleID=486&lt;/A&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;As I understand it the OEM agreement changed on 1st September 2005 whereby buying a piece of hardware such as a hard disk or CPU along with your purchase of OEM software would not make an environment where the license would be considered valid and it must be a "fully assembled pc".&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;It does not take long to find products on many stores that don’t have ANY mention of the requirements.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;I am saying that it should be mandatory for online resellers to show the rules of the OEM license agreement at the time of purchase.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Thoughts?&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;(and please do correct me if I am mistaken!)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Paulie&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft OEM Products</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/404/755.aspx#755</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:37:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:755</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;I have a new customer who was pretty shocked today when I informed them that much of the OEM software that they had recently purchased is effectively worthless under the OEM license agreement.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;They have spent a reasonable amount of money, effectively for nothing and though it is their responsibility to investigate the licence agreements, I couldn’t help feeling sorry for them. I really think that the resellers should attach very loud and clear warnings as to the nature of the OEM licensed products.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"&gt;Can Microsoft lean on trusted resellers to make OEM software more difficult to purchase?&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Or at least pressure them into making sure the end user really knows what they are getting?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on migrations</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/388/725.aspx#725</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:40:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:725</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Noticed this KB article "How to install Small Business Server 2003 in an existing Active Directory domain" on the MS website which is new.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/884453/en-us"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/884453/en-us&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Obviously has things in common with other procedures out there, but it is still well worth a read.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Introduction to Outlook 2003/Exchange 2003 feature set...</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/387/723.aspx#723</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:32:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:723</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;There do not seem to be many users out there thesedays that I come accross that have not already had some exposure to Outlook &amp;amp; Exchange either in thier own enviroment or a previous workplace.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have just finished putting in an&amp;nbsp;Exchange system as an upgrade from a pop3 system and 90% of the users do not yet understand how having an Exchange server extends the function of Outlook.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course some training is an option but getting the knowledge out to that number of users of 6 different sites is not going to be easy.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone recommend some online tutorials or resources that might be of help?&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Exchange Server Intelligent Message Filter</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/272/536.aspx#536</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:32:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:536</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Most of them are very happy with it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The system comes with a control panel so they are able to see at a glance
e-mail which has been quarantined and release it to the queue if they need to
do so.&amp;nbsp; They can also set black/white lists and define a list of valid
e-mail addresses for thier domain which increases the accuracy further again.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The spam identification is very accurate, I have yet to receive any complaints
about valid e-mail being blocked.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you want to have a look through the control panel send me a PM and I will
set you up with an account and you can have a look around.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Post migration problem</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/261/533.aspx#533</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:533</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Thanks for your help David; you pushed me in the right
direction enough to find the answer.&amp;nbsp; Basically I need to change the disk
from being dynamic back to basic by modifying the boot sector.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Exchange Server Intelligent Message Filter</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/272/532.aspx#532</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:55:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:532</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>I have not read that document as yet, but I do intend to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have had pretty good results with the IMF so far though.&amp;nbsp; I tend not to use it these days as I have e-mail cleansed by a 3rd party for all of my customers on support contracts.&amp;nbsp; I feel better about that as I know the nasties out there can't even communicate with the SBS box, saves bandwidth and reduces risk.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Post migration problem</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/forums/p/261/520.aspx#520</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 09:05:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:520</guid><dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;It certainly appears active in disk managment.&amp;nbsp; The option to reactive is not enabled.&amp;nbsp; It is running the OS so thats pretty active :D&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>